Ohio TCPA Case Law
Key court decisions shaping telemarketing compliance in Ohio
Total Decisions
9
Landmark (8+)
7
Notable (5-7)
2
Most Recent
Sep 2026
What These Cases Impact
Landmark Decisions (Score 8-10)
State ex rel. Yost v. Google, L.L.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals · June 2026 · King
Stingle v. Ascent Resources-Utica, L.L.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals · May 2026 · Robb
Notable Decisions (Score 5-7)
Allied Health & Chiropractic, L.L.C. v. State
Ohio Supreme Court · August 2026 · Shanahan, J.
Compare Case Law across states
Federal TCPA is the floor. Each state can — and many do — go further.
Stay Current
Weekly compliance digest
New enforcement actions, statute updates, and rule changes — delivered once a week. Know what changed before your next dial session.
Compliance, built in
Need an AI workforce that knows the rules?
Chief is the AI workforce for real estate operators. Calling, texting, and follow-up that respects Ohio consent requirements, calling hours, and DNC rules without you babysitting the dialer.
See Chief →This is a compliance reference tool, not legal advice. Data compiled from public statutes, LegiScan, CourtListener, state AG offices, and AI-assisted analysis. Verify all information with qualified counsel before relying on it. Full terms & data sources →